Loading
Side-by-side comparison for AI agent model selection.
Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5. DeepSeek V3.2 scores 55 on quality benchmarks at $0.63/1M tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 40 at $6.00/1M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 has higher benchmark scores and costs less per token. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers competitive value. For budget-conscious users, go with DeepSeek V3.2. For maximum quality, choose DeepSeek V3.2.
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Anthropic |
| Tier | Mid-Range | Budget |
| Quality Score | 55 | 40 |
| Input Price | $0.25/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output Price | $0.38/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Speed | 120 tok/s | 150 tok/s |
| Context Window | 128K | 200K |
| Max Output | 32K | 8K |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Task | DeepSeek V3.2 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | $1.36 | $11.70 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $10.34 |
| Writing | $0.36 | $3.12 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $2.76 |
| Analysis | $0.76 | $6.50 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $5.75 |
| $0.12 | $1.04 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $0.92 | |
| Summarization | $0.24 | $2.08 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $1.84 |
| Math & Reasoning | $0.45 | $3.90 | DeepSeek V3.2 saves $3.45 |